Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Lorsch (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Robert Lorsch

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Robert Lorsch
• Articles for deletion/Robert Lorsch (2nd nomination)

Robert Lorsch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable businessman; significant RS coverage cannot be found. Sources listed in the article are not convincing. The 2013 AfD closed as no consensus; three years on it can be revisited. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Comment I'm on the fence for keep or delete. From the Philanthropy section it seems as though he could meet WP:GNG. I will say that adding some in-line citations to the WP:BLP wouldn't hurt. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 02:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.