Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taede A. Smedes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Invalid^OS (talk) 17:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Taede A. Smedes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Taede A. Smedes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:39, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. I found enough reviews of his books to convince me of a pass of WP:AUTHOR, and there appears to be a lot more in the way of reliable sourcing about him, his books, and his views on religion available if you read Dutch. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Notability verified by sourcing now on page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.